The Brexit blame game

Yesterday, DUP leader and all round not very trustworthy person, Arlene Foster, blamed a "belligerent EU" for trying to "break up the UK".

With the DUP propping up the current Government, i would suggest she doesn't need any help.

Also, it is worth noting, that the DUP green-lit the "sufficient progress" statement at the end of 2017 allowing the Brexit process to continue.

Now, as I always say, either dear leader Arlene didn't understand what the WA contained, or lied.

And now blaming someone else for your stupidity or subterfuge is also dishonest.

At least with Brexiteers in control of most aspects of Brexit now, and Arlene hoping to reap another £1 billion in propping up another useless Prime Minister, it would be good, for once, if these feckers and shysters actually took ownership of the clusterfuck they created, rather than blaming everyone else.

Just a reminder that the backstop was originally NO specific, but that would have created a customs border in the Irish Sea, so the UK requested it be changed, and the EU agreed that the backstop should be UK-wide.

The Cabinet agreed. The DUP agreed.

So, either they didn't understand what they were agreeing to, or did and were acting in bad faith, knowing they would move against it later.

Hypocritical doesn't cover it.

@hayward_katy Tweets:

PM Johnson has made the removal of the #backstop the make-or-break matter when it comes to an exit deal with the EU.

So this thing is pretty damn important.

Time for a quick recap of what the 'loathed and detested' backstop actually is?

The #backstop is there specifically to meet the UK’s commitments to avoid a hard Irish border & protect the 1998 Good Friday (Belfast) Agreement & peace process.

This isn’t just of benefit or interest to the island of Ireland.

A broken Northern Ireland means a limping UK.

How does the #backstop work?

A v.brief explanation:

Having to apply & enforce customs procedures & rules around market access makes a border ‘hard’.

(just talking trade here)

Put simply, the greater the hassle in getting goods across a border, the harder that border is.

The #backstop makes it possible to avoid a hard

@BorderIrish by creating a situation in which moving goods across the Irish border is unencumbered by customs procedures or by need to prove adherence to market rules.

There are 2 dimensions to this: NI-specific & UK-wide. First, NI would remain in the VAT & excise regime of the EU so as to make VAT payments relating to cross-border trade as smooth as possible + to minimise risk (& lucrative potential) of smuggling.

It does not mean NI pays different tax rates nor that Brussels sets its rates. 2nd: NI wd be effectively in part of the Single Market for goods, specifically those the EU is worried about for health & safety reasons (e.g. meat quality, exhaust emissions, toy standards). ie: NI will continue to maintain the same standards it does now on these products

If EU standards change on this specific set of products, it will be expected NI will at min. voluntarily align.

UK govt promised NI it too will align but not yet in law.

We don't know what'll happen if neither of these things occur.

NB: this is re: consumer confidence/safety

This was at the request of the UK govt.

It means there wouldn’t need to be customs procedures on goods going from NI into either GB or EU.

It will also relieve a great deal of hassle for UK trade into EU more broadly

But there are downsides to this when it comes to UK’s ability to make its own trade deals around goods.

Hence the WA provision #backstop could be stepped down one part at a time.

Bear in mind: UK’s future relationship with EU still to be decided. UK could go for this anyway.

The EU isn't more fond of the #backstop than the UK is.

It is a compromise to manage a uniquely complicated situation. It is awkward & inconvenient for both sides.

Hence, right from exit day, there will be a negotiating track focused on avoiding its use.

*#Backstop is not the future EU-UK relationship!*

It'll only come into force at end of transition period, currently set to be 1 Jan 2023 at latest but it cd be extended.

Even then it might be that just part of it will be in play.

It'll be under constant review.

To conclude: 3 quick fact checks. 🔎

The #backstop does *not* see the UK continue on in the EU's single market.

Even if, post-2023, it is in play, there will be an end to freedom of movement of goods, people, capital & services between the UK & EU. #Brexit

The #backstop does not see the UK (or NI) blindly following EU rules with no say.

The #WithdrawalAgreement contains bodies & mechanisms for the UK & EU to come to agreement about the implementation of the backstop (among other things).

We lose these if there is #NoDeal.

The backstop would mean increased checks on specified goods coming from GB into NI. This is largely a stepping-up of checks that already happen.

**Worth noting that this is exactly what UK govt foresees happening in the event of a #NoDeal**

So there you have it. #backstop

https://twitter.com/hayward_katy/status/1156835486142533632